
Clinical trials in pain and neurological research have historically faced steep hurdles: lengthy timelines, high costs, and subjective data endpoints that often obscure true efficacy. With only around 15% of central nervous system (CNS) drugs successfully moving from Phase 1 to approval, researchers clearly need more reliable tools. Artificial intelligence (AI) analytics has emerged as…

Regulatory Risks of Wearables in Clinical Trials Are Real (and Avoidable) Wearables have become indispensable in modern clinical trials, tracking vital signs, capturing real-world evidence, and improving patient engagement from anywhere. But as their use increases, so do the regulatory risks. While wearable devices open the door to faster, more patient-centric research, they also introduce…

The Evolution of Remote Patient Monitoring in Clinical Trials Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has come a long way from the early days of paper-based symptom diaries and intermittent in-clinic assessments. Traditional monitoring approaches placed a heavy burden on both patients and research sites, requiring frequent visits, manual data entry, and limited insight into patient health…

Why Wearable Tech Is Changing Clinical Trials Wearable devices are doing more than counting steps—they’re redefining how clinical trials are conducted and how participants engage. In the era of decentralized and hybrid clinical trials, wearables like fitness trackers, smartwatches, and medical-grade sensors are becoming essential tools for improving patient engagement and retention. These devices allow…

What Is BYOD in Clinical Trials? Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) is changing the way clinical trials collect and manage data. Instead of requiring participants to use study-provided devices, BYOD allows them to use their own smartphones, tablets, or computers to enter data—making the process more convenient and intuitive. Traditionally, clinical trials relied on provisioning…

What Are Wearables and How Are They Used in Clinical Trials? Wearable technology is transforming clinical trials by making it easier than ever to collect real-time health data from participants. These devices—ranging from fitness trackers and smartwatches to advanced biosensors—give researchers continuous, objective insights into a patient’s health without requiring frequent site visits or self-reported…

The Impact of Bias on Clinical Trials and Patient Safety Bias, despite best efforts and best intentions, continues to impact clinical research. There’s the so-called “sponsorship effect,” where, in a recent study, psychiatric drugs were reported to be about 50% more effective in trials that were funded by the drug’s manufacturer. It may be natural…

The Link Between EDC and Patient Safety The shared commitment among researchers and healthcare providers to patient safety influences every aspect of study design and execution. The adoption of Electronic Data Capture (EDC) systems has always been driven by the need to enhance patient safety through improving data accuracy, reducing errors, and facilitating real-time monitoring.…

For years, electronic data capture (EDC) systems have been the backbone of clinical trials, efficiently collecting and managing study data. But the role of EDC systems is evolving. In today’s fast-paced research landscape, EDC platforms are no longer just repositories for data—they’re becoming dynamic clinical intelligence hubs that drive smarter, faster decisions. Thanks to advancements…

When it comes to managing imaging data in clinical trials, researchers find many challenges. Disjointed systems that don’t talk to each other, manual data transfers that invite errors, and time lost navigating segmented workflows. Integrating imaging data with electronic data capture (EDC) systems has traditionally been a headache, with limited interoperability and inefficiencies slowing progress.…